Washington v. Spokane Tribe of Indians
Washington v. Spokane Tribe of Indians, 517 U.S. 1129 (1996)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida, ante, p. 44.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- UNITED STATES of America v. THE SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS
- Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State
- The Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State, the State of Washington Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission, the Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State, the State of Washington Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission
Most recent
- UNITED STATES of America v. THE SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS
- The Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State, the State of Washington Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission, the Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State, the State of Washington Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission
- Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.