Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United States ex rel. Green

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

• (“[T]he private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the [False Claims Act] exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the United States. The relator’s right to recovery exists solely as a mechanism for deterring fraud and returning funds to the federal treasury”)

  United States v. Schimmels (In re Schimmels), 127 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1997)

• U.S. Courts of Appeals1
• Bankruptcy Courts1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.