TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rodriguez v. United States

Antonio Rodriguez v. United States

Rodriguez v. United States, 518 U.S. 1025 (1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 24, 1996
Docket
No. 95-8929
Citations
518 U.S. 1025116 S. Ct. 2565135 L. Ed. 2d 108264 U.S.L.W. 38551996 U.S. LEXIS 4178
Cited by 15 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (“[Ojnce the State proved the elements of robbery, it was not required to offer any additional proof to establish the charge of grand larceny.”)
    Cotton v. Fordice, 157 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 1998)
  • (claim that trial court erred in admitting evidence procedurally barred where defendant failed to pursue ruling on motion in limine and further, failed to raise contemporaneous objection to admission of evidence at trial)
    Rushing v. State, 711 So. 2d 450 (Miss. 1998)

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1997: 31998: 61999: 22000: 12004: 12005: 12011: 119972026peak 1998 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Evans v. State725 So. 2d 613 (Miss. 1997)
  2. Randall v. State716 So. 2d 584 (Miss. 1998)
  3. Bell v. State725 So. 2d 836 (Miss. 1998)
  4. Turner v. State732 So. 2d 937 (Miss. 1999)
  5. Scott v. State878 So. 2d 933 (Miss. 2004)
  6. Holly v. State716 So. 2d 979 (Miss. 1998)

Most recent

  1. William Holly v. State of Mississippi435 F. App'x 339 (5th Cir. 2011)
  2. Wells v. State903 So. 2d 739 (Miss. 2005)
  3. Scott v. State878 So. 2d 933 (Miss. 2004)
  4. Ballenger v. State761 So. 2d 214 (Miss. 2000)
  5. Turner v. State732 So. 2d 937 (Miss. 1999)
  6. Harris v. State731 So. 2d 1125 (Miss. 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list