Honeywell, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc.
Honeywell, Inc. v. Litton Sys., Inc., 520 U.S. 1111 (1997)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case *1112 remanded for further consideration in light of Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., ante, p. 17.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(concluding that no inequitable conduct existed where a patented had, in fact, intentionally withheld a reference, but that reference was ultimately considered by the PTO examiner)
-
(record was received and considered during reissue proceedings)
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd.
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.
- Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
- ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc.
- Hay & Forage Industries v. New Holland North America, Inc.
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.