TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cannon v. United States

Cannon v. United States, 118 U.S. 355 (1886)
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 10, 1886
Judges
Blatchford
Citations
118 U.S. 3556 S. Ct. 106429 L. Ed. 5611886 U.S. LEXIS 1937
Cited by 7
Syllabus
As the court had no jurisdiction in this case, 116 U. S. 55, and it was decided at the present term, the judgment is vacated, the mandate recalled, and the writ of error dismissed.
Summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE TERRITORY OE UTAH. This case was argued on'the 20th and 23d of November, 1885, and decided December 14, 1885. 116 U. S. 55. The reasons for setting aside the judgment and dismissing the writ of error are stated in the opinion of the court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Blatcheord

Mr. Justice Blatcheord delivered the opinion of the court.

The decision in Snow v. United States, ante, p. 346, dismissing the writs of error for want of- jurisdiction, shows that there was no jurisdiction of the writ of error in this case. As the decision reported in 116 U. S. 55 , was made at the present term, the judgment rendered on the 14th of December, 1885, affirming the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah, is set aside and vacated ; the mandate is recalled; and The writ of error is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 7 cases

View all citing references →
1887: 11890: 11892: 11893: 11944: 11984: 11999: 118872026peak 1887 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Barlow153 P.2d 647 (Utah 1944)
  2. United States v. Sanges144 U.S. 310 (1892)
  3. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co. v. Texas Cent. Ry. Co.32 F. 525 (U.S. Cir. Ct. 1887)
  4. Easton v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.44 F. 7 (1890)
  5. Natl. Gas Dist. v. Sevier Co. UtilityNo. 03A01-9902-CH-00077 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 13, 1999)
  6. Sirilan v. Castro1 N. Mar. I. Commw. 1082 (N. Mar. I. 1984)

Most recent

  1. Natl. Gas Dist. v. Sevier Co. UtilityNo. 03A01-9902-CH-00077 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 13, 1999)
  2. Sirilan v. Castro1 N. Mar. I. Commw. 1082 (N. Mar. I. 1984)
  3. State v. Barlow153 P.2d 647 (Utah 1944)
  4. McClaskey v. Barr54 F. 781 (1893)
  5. United States v. Sanges144 U.S. 310 (1892)
  6. Easton v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.44 F. 7 (1890)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Cannon v. United States, 116 U.S. 55 (1885) 36

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list