TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sal Tinnerello & Sons, Inc. v. Town of Stonington

Sal Tinnerello & Sons, Inc. v. Town of Stonington, 525 U.S. 923 (1998)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 5, 1998
Docket
No. 98-69
Citations
525 U.S. 923119 S. Ct. 278142 L. Ed. 2d 23067 U.S.L.W. 32391998 U.S. LEXIS 6384
Cited by 9 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of BFI Waste Systems of North America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • ("[T]he primary consideration in determining whether the impairment is substantial is the extent to which reasonable expectations under the contract have been disrupted.")
    Cloutier v. State, 42 A.3d 816 (N.H. 2012)

Cited by 9 cases

View all citing references →
1998: 11999: 42000: 12010: 12012: 12015: 119982026peak 1999 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sg Cowen Securities Corporation v. Robert W. Messih224 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2000)
  2. Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd.3 P.3d 1088 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999)
  3. Brown v. Renter's Choice, Inc.55 F. Supp. 2d 788 (N.D. Ohio 1999)
  4. Becton v. Thomas48 F. Supp. 2d 747 (W.D. Tenn. 1999)
  5. TM Park Avenue Associates v. Pataki44 F. Supp. 2d 158 (N.D.N.Y. 1999)
  6. Cloutier v. State42 A.3d 816 (N.H. 2012)

Most recent

  1. Groton v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesNo. SC19347 (Conn. June 30, 2015)
  2. Cloutier v. State42 A.3d 816 (N.H. 2012)
  3. Tuttle v. MED. MAL. JOINT UNDERWRITING992 A.2d 624 (N.H. 2010)
  4. Sg Cowen Securities Corporation v. Robert W. Messih224 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2000)
  5. Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd.3 P.3d 1088 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999)
  6. Brown v. Renter's Choice, Inc.55 F. Supp. 2d 788 (N.D. Ohio 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list