TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hegler v. Faulkner

Hegler v. Faulkner, 127 U.S. 482 (1888)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 14, 1888
Docket
No. 283
Judges
Miller
Citations
127 U.S. 4828 S. Ct. 120332 L. Ed. 2101888 U.S. LEXIS 2010
Syllabus
There being nothing in the record to show that the Circuit Court had jurisdiction of the case', this court of its own motion reverses the judgment and remands the cause for further proceedings.
Summary
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. The case is stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Miller

Mr. Justice Miller delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to the. Circuit Court of the United States for the District, of Nebraska.

There is in the record presented here a transcript showing that the action was first brought October 4, .1878, in the District Court of Richardson County, in the State of Nebraska, in which the original pétition or declaration was filed. The suit was to recover the possession of a tract of land situated in that county, containing 320 acres, and for rents and profits alleged to be of ■ the value of $$500. The defendants entered their appearance on May 6, 1879, and leave was granted them to answer in thirty days. The plaintiff was ruled to reply in. fifty days, and the cause continued. An answer was filed May 17, 1879, and this appears to have been done in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska, in which all the subsequent proceedings in the progress of the cause were taken.

Ther,e is no evidence of any petition or order for the removal of the case into this latter court from the state court sitting in the county of Richardson, nqr is there any statement anywhere of the citizenship of the parties. It appears that a trial was thereafter had and a verdict rendered for the defendants. The only attempt made to' show any jurisdiction in the Circuit Court, in which that- trial took place, is a short stipulation between the parties made in that court December 8, 1882, by which it was agreed that the amount in controversy in the action exceeded five thousand dollars.

A judgment in favor of the defendants was entered upon this verdict, to which the present writ of error is directed. It is very clear that this verdict and judgment must be set aside, because the Circuit Court had no jurisdiction of the case.

.

The jud-gment of the court helow is reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1903: 11926: 119032026peak 1903 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gibbs v. Gibbs73 P. 641 (Utah 1903) · Dissent
  2. Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National Bank270 U.S. 438 (1926)

Most recent

  1. Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National Bank270 U.S. 438 (1926)
  2. Gibbs v. Gibbs73 P. 641 (Utah 1903) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list