TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Drew

United States v. Drew, 131 U.S. 21 (1889)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 13, 1889
Docket
No. 1061
Judges
Bradley, Miller, Field, Jones
Citations
131 U.S. 219 S. Ct. 67233 L. Ed. 931889 U.S. LEXIS 1794
Syllabus
United States v. Jones, ante, 1, affirmed and applied to this case.
Summary
error to the circuit court of the united states for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. The case is stated in tHe opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Bradley

Mr. Justice Bradley delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit in equity brought against the United States to establish the claim of the plaintiff to have land warrants or certificates of location for one thousand and fifteen acres of land made out and delivered to him by way of indemnity and satisfaction for a certain concession or grant of land made by the Spanish governor to one Francisco Adante, in 1788, the land itself having been surveyed as public land by the United States and disposed of to purchasers. The claim is made under the provisions of the act of June 2d, 1858, entitled “An act to provide for the location of certain confirmed private land claims of the State of Missouri, and for other purposes,” 11 Stat. 294 , the claim in question having been confirmed by act of Congress passed February 28, 1823, 3 Stat. 727 . The suit is subject to the same objections which exist in relation to the suits of Carrie Jones and others, just disposed of, and the same decree must be made as in those cases.

The decree of the Circuit Court is reversed, am,d the cause rema/nded, with instructions to dismiss the originad petition or hill.

Mr. Justice Miller and Mr. Justice Field dissented, for the reasons stated in their dissent in United States v. Jones.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1937: 119372026peak 1937 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Morrow76 P.2d 971 (Or. 1937)

Most recent

  1. State v. Morrow76 P.2d 971 (Or. 1937)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list