TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Arnold v. Luebbers

Arnold v. Luebbers, Superintendent, Farmington Correctional Center

Arnold v. Luebbers, 546 U.S. 865 (2005)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 3, 2005
Docket
No. 04-10674
Citations
546 U.S. 865126 S. Ct. 163163 L. Ed. 2d 15074 U.S.L.W. 32062005 U.S. LEXIS 5662
Cited by 14 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (“The prosecutors made it a theme of their summation that the jury’s failure to sentence Bates to death would be akin to ordering the execution of Bates’s next victim. Voting for a life sentence for this ‘rabid dog’ was equivalent to putting a gun in his hand.”)
    Cauthern v. Colson, 736 F.3d 465 (6th Cir. 2013)

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
2006: 32007: 12008: 42009: 22010: 22013: 12021: 120062026peak 2008 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Davis514 F.3d 596 (6th Cir. 2008)
  2. Romell Broom v. Betty Mitchell441 F.3d 392 (6th Cir. 2006)
  3. United States v. Case654 F. Supp. 2d 747 (E.D. Tenn. 2009)
  4. Richard Joseph v. Ralph Coyle, Warden469 F.3d 441 (6th Cir. 2006)
  5. Darryl M. Durr v. Betty Mitchell, Warden487 F.3d 423 (6th Cir. 2007)
  6. Slagle v. Bagley457 F.3d 501 (6th Cir. 2006) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. Shine-Johnson v. Warden, Belmont Correctional InstitutionNo. 2:20-cv-01873 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 29, 2021)
  2. Ronald Cauthern v. Roland Colson736 F.3d 465 (6th Cir. 2013)
  3. Goff v. Bagley601 F.3d 445 (6th Cir. 2010)
  4. Sutton v. Bell683 F. Supp. 2d 640 (E.D. Tenn. 2010)
  5. United States v. Case654 F. Supp. 2d 747 (E.D. Tenn. 2009)
  6. Smith v. Mitchell567 F.3d 246 (6th Cir. 2009)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list