TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

List v. Pennsylvania

List v. Pennsylvania, 131 U.S. 396 (1888)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
December 10, 1888
Docket
No. 984
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
131 U.S. 3969 S. Ct. 79433 L. Ed. 2221888 U.S. LEXIS 2047
Cited by 26
Syllabus
The death of the accused in a criminal case brought here by writ of error abates the suit.
Summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. The case is stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per curiam : The’ death of George B. List, the plaintiff in error in this cause, having been suggested in a communication from counsel for defendant in error to the clerk, and it appearing to the court that this is a criminal case, it is considered by the court that this cause has abated. Therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the writ of error in this cause be, and the same is hereby, .Dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 26 cases

View all citing references →
1909: 11914: 21921: 11923: 11927: 11948: 21949: 11959: 11963: 11967: 11971: 11972: 11973: 11980: 31984: 11985: 12001: 22002: 12003: 12006: 12011: 119092026peak 1980 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dorothy Crooker v. United States325 F.2d 318 (8th Cir. 1963)
  2. United States v. David Eugene Morton, James M. Martin635 F.2d 723 (8th Cir. 1980)
  3. Surland v. State895 A.2d 1034 (Md. 2006)
  4. United States v. Rorie58 M.J. 399 (C.A.A.F. 2003)
  5. United States v. Dunne173 F. 254 (9th Cir. 1909)
  6. Frank v. State56 A.2d 810 (Md. 1948)

Most recent

  1. Bevel v. Com.717 S.E.2d 789 (Va. 2011)
  2. Surland v. State895 A.2d 1034 (Md. 2006)
  3. United States v. Rorie58 M.J. 399 (C.A.A.F. 2003)
  4. Ex Parte Estate of Cook848 So. 2d 916 (Ala. 2002)
  5. United States v. ANDREW ANTHONY CHRISTOPHER273 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2001)
  6. United States v. Christopher273 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2001)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list