TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Washington v. Fischer

Washington v. Fischer, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility

Washington v. Fischer, 546 U.S. 1217 (2006)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 27, 2006
Docket
No. 05-8276
Citations
546 U.S. 1217126 S. Ct. 1434164 L. Ed. 2d 13774 U.S.L.W. 34852006 U.S. LEXIS 1881
Cited by 22 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (there was nothing objectively unreasonable about counsel’s decision to advise petitioner to testify where his first-hand account of the fatal shooting was the only source of exculpatory evidence available at the guilt-innocence phase of trial)
    Coker v. Thaler, 670 F. Supp. 2d 541 (N.D. Tex. 2009)

Cited by 22 cases

View all citing references →
2006: 52007: 42008: 22009: 12010: 12011: 22012: 22013: 12015: 22017: 12022: 120062026peak 2006 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Martinez v. Dretke426 F. Supp. 2d 403 (W.D. Tex. 2006)
  2. Moore v. Quarterman526 F. Supp. 2d 654 (W.D. Tex. 2007)
  3. Parr v. Thaler481 F. App'x 872 (5th Cir. 2012)
  4. Bartee v. Quarterman574 F. Supp. 2d 624 (W.D. Tex. 2008)
  5. Carl Blue v. Rick Thaler, Director665 F.3d 647 (5th Cir. 2011)
  6. United States v. Acosta475 F.3d 677 (5th Cir. 2007)

Most recent

  1. Doe v. Bemer215 Conn. App. 504 (2022)
  2. Friedman v. Gomez159 A.3d 703 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017)
  3. Kendall v. Commissioner of CorrectionNo. AC36698 (Conn. App. Ct. Dec. 22, 2015)
  4. Tyson v. Commissioner of CorrectionNo. AC36258 (Conn. App. Ct. Jan. 20, 2015)
  5. Melendez v. Commissioner of Correction62 A.3d 629 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013)
  6. Garza v. Thaler909 F. Supp. 2d 578 (W.D. Tex. 2012)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list