TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cross v. California

Cross v. California Cooper v. California

Cross v. California, 528 U.S. 801 (1999)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 4, 1999
Docket
Nos. 98-9308; No. 98-9504
Citations
528 U.S. 801120 S. Ct. 309

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist.; and

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and eases remanded for further consideration in light of Lilly v. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116 (1999).

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 26 cases

View all citing references →
1999: 32000: 42001: 32002: 32003: 12004: 12007: 12008: 12010: 22014: 12018: 32019: 319992026peak 2000 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Marsh and McLennan Companies, Inc.944 A.2d 315 (Conn. 2008)
  2. Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.203 F.3d 1028 (8th Cir. 2000) · Dissent
  3. United States v. Dortch199 F.3d 193 (5th Cir. 1999)
  4. United States v. Payne591 F.3d 46 (2d Cir. 2010)
  5. United States v. Frank Dickerson, A.K.A. Lane, A.K.A. Frank Dixon248 F.3d 1036 (11th Cir. 2001)
  6. In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation191 F.R.D. 472 (W.D. Pa. 1999)

Most recent

  1. State of Louisiana Versus Adam LittletonNo. 18-KA-354 (La. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2019)
  2. Hanover Ins. Co. v. Riceland Aviation, Inc.269 So. 3d 911 (La. Ct. App. 2019)
  3. Hanover Insurance Company v. Riceland Aviation, IncNo. CW-0018-0892 (La. Ct. App. Apr. 10, 2019)
  4. Chelsea MacE v. Sherman TurnerNo. CA-0018-0040 (La. Ct. App. July 18, 2018)
  5. State v. Eaglin239 So. 3d 1001 (La. Ct. App. 2018)
  6. State of Louisiana v. Kyvonte Latrell EaglinNo. KA-0017-0657 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 28, 2018)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Lilly v. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116 (1999) 965

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list