Quoc Thai Minh Thuy v. United States
Quoc Thai Minh Thuy v. United States, 534 U.S. 1032 (2001)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that Apprendi rule does not apply retroactively on collateral review)
-
(holding claims pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), are not cognizable on collateral review)
-
("The first exception clearly does not apply here because Apprendi did not place drug conspiracies beyond the scope of the state's authority to proscribe.")
-
(all holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(C), which requires a retroactivity determination to be made by the Supreme Court itself, does not apply to initial petitions)
Cited by 58 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.