Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Hampton
Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Hampton, 534 U.S. 1131 (2002)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(finding that where two African American women had been suspected of shoplifting and briefly detained on the basis of their race, the store’s conduct was sufficiently reprehensible to support the award of $1.1 million in punitive damages)
-
(applying Gore guideposts to argument that punitive damages award for violation of Title VII violated the Fifth Amendment)
-
("Because the jury rejected the Plaintiffs’ claims that they were constructively discharged, the district court did not err in concluding that they were not entitled to back or front pay.”)
Cited by 15 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.