TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stone v. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services

Stone v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services

Stone v. Los Angeles Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs., 519 U.S. 936 (1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 15, 1996
Docket
No. 96-5614
Citations
519 U.S. 936117 S. Ct. 313136 L. Ed. 2d 22965 U.S.L.W. 32931996 U.S. LEXIS 6264

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (defines bolstering as “permitting] an identification made by one witness to be corroborated by the testimony of another witness who merely testifies that the identification occurred”)
  • (prosecutor permitted to cross-examine defense’s expert witness with reports containing conclusions of non-testifying expert where non-testifying expert reported these conclusions to defense expert who relied on them in formulating his opinion)

Cited by 22 cases

View all citing references →
1997: 31998: 11999: 32000: 62001: 22004: 22007: 12008: 12009: 12010: 12014: 119972026peak 2000 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Holbrook529 S.E.2d 510 (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)
  2. State v. Golphin533 S.E.2d 168 (N.C. 2000)
  3. State v. Call508 S.E.2d 496 (N.C. 1998)
  4. State v. Blakeney531 S.E.2d 799 (N.C. 2000)
  5. State v. Bell603 S.E.2d 93 (N.C. 2004)
  6. State v. Parker516 S.E.2d 106 (N.C. 1999)

Most recent

  1. State v. BrownNo. 14-35 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 5, 2014)
  2. State v. Ray697 S.E.2d 319 (N.C. 2010)
  3. State v. Fowler676 S.E.2d 523 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)
  4. Campbell v. Poole555 F. Supp. 2d 345 (W.D.N.Y. 2008)
  5. Osorio v. Conway496 F. Supp. 2d 285 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)
  6. State v. Bell603 S.E.2d 93 (N.C. 2004)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list