Washington Market Co. v. District of Columbia
Washington Market Company v. District of Columbia
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
Per Curiam:
This is an appeal from the decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia dismissing the bill of *63 complaint filed by appellant therein, the object of the bill having been to restrain the defendants from selling, or attempting to sell, certain property of complainant, on account of certain assessments for street improvements, and also to cancel and annul two tax lien certificates therein named,; and counsel for appellant having stated in open court that such assessments and lien certificates have been, pending this appeal, quashed and annulled at law by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, and that only the disposition of costs is involved herein, it is ordered that said appeal be Mr. William Birney for appellant.
Mr. George G. Hazelton and Mr. S. T. Thomas for appellee.
Dismissed without costs to either party.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 26 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court5
- U.S. Courts of Appeals7
- Federal District Courts3
- State Highest Courts8
- State Trial Courts1
- Territorial Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Donovan v. Cunningham
- William E. Brock v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Of America
- Montgomery County v. Maryland-Washington Metropolitan District
- Woodland v. Dept. of Rev.
- Brock v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
- Celli v. Webb
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.