Ensign v. Leahy
Charles B. Ensign, trading as C. B. Ensign & Company v. William J. Leahy, Jr.
Ensign v. Leahy, 210 Ill. App. 249 (1918)
Headnotes
Abstract of the Decision.
Bills and notes, § 440*—when judgment for defendant not warranted ly evidence. In an action to recover the balance due on a note, which was a part of an outline of studies, which were never given, and was detached and sold to plaintiff for value before maturity, where the evidence was undisputed that plaintiff was an innocent purchaser for value and defendant made payments on the note in its detached form at plaintiff’s office, where he admitted he saw the note, evidence held insufficient to warrant a judgment for defendant.
Summary
Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. ■
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Mr. Justice McDonald delivered the opinion of the court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.