Hauser v. Marmon Chicago Co.

F. R. Valentine Hauser and Benjamin Neuman, by Frederick R. Hauser, in Error v. Marmon Chicago Company, in Error

Hauser v. Marmon Chicago Co., 208 Ill. App. 171 (1917)

Court: Appellate Court of Illinois · State Appellate Courts
Decided: October 31, 1917
Docket: No. Gen. No. 22,556
Judges: Taylor
Citations: 208 Ill. App. 1711917 Ill. App. LEXIS 802
Disposition: Affirmed.

Cited by 4

Headnotes

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Infants—when fraudulent representations as to age not shown. In an action to recover back a part payment on the purchase price of an automobile made while plaintiffs were minors, evidence held insufficient to show fraudulent representations by plaintiffs as to their ages. 2. Infants, § 23*—when entitled to rescind contract of purchase and recover part of price paid. Minors, upon restoration of an automobile to the seller, although it has been used and has deteriorated in value, are entitled to rescind the contract of sale and recover back that part of the purchase price which has been paid.

Summary

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John J. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1916.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Taylor

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Mr. Justice Taylor delivered the opinion of the court. 2. Infants, § 23*—when entitled to rescind contract of purchase and recover part of price paid. Minors, upon restoration of an automobile to the seller, although it has been used and has deteriorated in value, are entitled to rescind the contract of sale and recover back that part of the purchase price which has been paid.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Utterstrom v. Myron D. Kidder, Inc.124 A. 725 (Me. 1924)
Hunter v. Egolf Motor Co.268 Ill. App. 1 (1932)
Burnet v. Chapin274 Ill. App. 186 (1934)
Stoffberg v. Hosbach Motors, Inc.4 Balt. C. Rep. 303 (1924)

Most recent

Burnet v. Chapin274 Ill. App. 186 (1934)
Hunter v. Egolf Motor Co.268 Ill. App. 1 (1932)
Utterstrom v. Myron D. Kidder, Inc.124 A. 725 (Me. 1924)
Stoffberg v. Hosbach Motors, Inc.4 Balt. C. Rep. 303 (1924)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list