Buell v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.
BUELL v. CONNECTICUT MUT. LIFE INS. CO.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
WELKER, District Judge.
Before such an order will be made, the defendant must make reasonable proof of the existence of such paper, its pertinency to the issue, and that it is in the possession of or under the control of the plaintiff.
The affidavit of the attorney of the defendant, stating that he believes, from reliable sources, of information and inquiry, that there is such a letter pertinent to the issue, and in possession of the plaintiff, is not such reasonable proof of the facts as to authorize such order, which is therefore refused.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.