TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stansell v. Western Union Tel. Co.

Stansell v. Western Union Tel. Co., 107 F. 668 (1900)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · Historical Federal Courts
Decided
November 1, 1900
Docket
No. 936
Judges
Lboti, Wki
Citations
107 F. 6681900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4935
Headnotes
1. Telegraph — Delay in Delivery of Money — Damages. In an action against a telegraph company to recover damages for the failure to promptly deliver money transmitted through such company to the plaintiff, the fact that plaintiff was evicted from her house because of her failure to receive such money, and the injury to her reputation generally because of such eviction, are consequences too remote to be considered as elements of damages.1 3. Same — Mental Distress. Mental distress, unaccompanied, by physical injury, is not a proper element of damages recoverable from, a telegraph company for a failure to promptly deliver money sent through its agency to plaintiff.
Summary
At Law. On motion to strike out paragraphs 7 and 8 of the complaint. Paragraphs 7 and 8 of the complaint are as follows: “(7) That because of the negligence of defendant in failing to transmit and deliver said money as it promised and agreed to do, the plaintiff M. B. Stan-sell and her family of three (8) children were compelled to vacate their said home on the twenty-first (21st) day of June, 1898, for the nonpayment of rent. “(8) That the plaintiff M. B. Stansell was greatly excited and disturbed because of her failure to receive said money as expected, and suffered great mental anguish, and her feelings were greatly injured, and she was greatly humiliated, and suffered in reputation because of her said eviction, said plaintiff possessing a large circle of acquaintances in said city of Memphis, Tennessee, at that time; all to her damage in the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500).”

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Wkilboti

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

'WKI.LBOti'S', District Judge.

I am of opinion that the damages claimed in said paragraphs of the complaint are speculative and remote, and, furthermore, that mental distress, unaccompanied by physical injury, is not a proper element of damages in a case of this sort. The motion to strike out will be allowed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1901: 11911: 11914: 11921: 11923: 119012026peak 1901 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Corcoran v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.142 P. 29 (Wash. 1914)
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ferguson60 N.E. 674 (Ind. 1901)
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Chouteau1911 OK 216, 115 P. 879
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hall287 F. 297 (4th Cir. 1923)
  5. Churches v. Western Union Telegraph Co.195 P. 610 (Kan. 1921)

Most recent

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hall287 F. 297 (4th Cir. 1923)
  2. Churches v. Western Union Telegraph Co.195 P. 610 (Kan. 1921)
  3. Corcoran v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.142 P. 29 (Wash. 1914)
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Chouteau1911 OK 216, 115 P. 879
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ferguson60 N.E. 674 (Ind. 1901)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list