TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Najour

In re Najour, 174 F. 735 (1909)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · Historical Federal Courts
Decided
December 1, 1909
Judges
Newman
Citations
174 F. 7351909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5963
Disposition
Granted.
Headnotes
Aliens (§ 61*) — Naturalization-—“Free White Person.” A Syrian from Mt. Lebanon, near Beirut, is a free white person, within Rev. St. § 2169 (XT. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1333), providing for the naturalization of free white persons of other countries as citizens of the United States; such term being construed to refer to race rather than to coior, and to include all members of the Caucasian race. [Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Aliens, Cent. Dig. §§ 119-122; Dec. Dig. § 61.*]
Summary
Application for the naturalization of Costa George Najour.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Newman

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

NEWMAN, District Judge.

In admitting to naturalization the petitioner, Costa George Najour, I wish to say this: Although the term “free white person” is used in the statutes (Rev. St. § 2169 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1333]), this expression, I think, refers to race, rather than to color, and fair or dark complexion should not be allowed to control, provided the person seeking naturalization comes within the classification of the white or Caucasian race, and I consider the Syrians as belonging to what we recognize, and what the world recognizes, as the white race. The applicant comes from Mt. Lebanon, near Beirut. He is not particularly dark, and has none of the characteristics or appearance of the Mongolian race, but, so far as I can see and judge, has the appearance and characteristics of the Caucasian race.

Quite a recent work, which I have before me now, “The World’s People,” by Dr. A. PI. Keane, classifies, without question or qualification in any way, Syrians as a part of the Caucasian or white race, and this they are, so far as my knowledge and information goes. Dr. Keane divides the world’s people into four classes, the “Negro or black,' in the Sudan, South Africa, and Oceania (Australasia); Mongol or yellow, in Central, North, and East Asia; Amerinds (red or brown), in the New World; and Caucasians (white and also dark), in North Africa, Europe, Irania, India, Western Asia, and Polynesia.” Discussing the various nationalities and subdivisions of these four general di *736 visions, be unhesitatingly places the Syrians in the Caucasian or white division.

The Assistant United States Attorney, representing the government, objecting to the naturalization of Najour, seems to attach some importance to the fact that the applicant was born within the dominions of Turkey, and was heretofore a subject of the Sultan of Turkey. I do not think this should cut any figure in the matter. If it did, the extension of the Turkish Empire over, people unquestionably of the white race would deprive them of the privilege of naturalization.

In my opinion the applicant belongs to the white race within the meaning of the statute, and the other requisites existing after careful examination, he is clearly entitled to naturalization.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11912: 11913: 21915: 11917: 11927: 119102026peak 1913 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Balsara180 F. 694 (2d Cir. 1910)
  2. In re Alverto198 F. 688 (E.D. Pa. 1912)
  3. Dow v. United States226 F. 145 (4th Cir. 1915)
  4. Ex parte Shahid205 F. 812 (E.D.S.C. 1913)
  5. In re Akhay Kumar Mozumdar207 F. 115 (E.D. Wash. 1913)
  6. In re Sadar Bhagwab Singh246 F. 496 (E.D. Pa. 1917)

Most recent

  1. In re Fisher21 F.2d 1007 (N.D. Cal. 1927)
  2. In re Sadar Bhagwab Singh246 F. 496 (E.D. Pa. 1917)
  3. Dow v. United States226 F. 145 (4th Cir. 1915)
  4. Ex parte Shahid205 F. 812 (E.D.S.C. 1913)
  5. In re Akhay Kumar Mozumdar207 F. 115 (E.D. Wash. 1913)
  6. In re Alverto198 F. 688 (E.D. Pa. 1912)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list