Gregory v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

Money, the proceeds of a note, was deposited to the credit of a suit in equity in a Circuit Court, in a Safe Deposit Company. G. brought another suit in equity in the same court, against the company and P. to obtain a decree declaring him to be entitled to the money. The Circuit Court dismissed the bill on the ground that the question ought to be adjudicated ' in the first named suit, but did not decree that the dismissal was without prejudice to the right of G-. to make his claim in that suit. This court, on appeal by G., modified the decree to that effect, but gave the costs of this court to the appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. The court stated the case as follows: In an action at law, brought in the court below, in the name of Charles F. Jones against William C. N. Swift, judgment was rendered against the latter upon a promissory note dated April 20, 1883. That judgment was satisfied by the payment into court, pursuant to an agreement between the parties, of the amount, principal and interest, due Upon it — $21,926.90. Subsequently, January 10, 1887, that sum was transferred' to the credit of the suit in equity in the same court of Charles A. Gregory v. Frederick. A. Pike et al., No. 2170, “ to remain subject to the order of the court in that cause.” On the 26th day of Marchj 1887, the clerk deposited $21,000 of the above sum in the Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company, to be held by it subject to the order of the court. The balance was deposited with the Merchants’ National Bank of Boston. ■The present suit, was brought August 6, 1887; by Gregory and Jones against the above corporations and Mary II. Pike, executrix of Frederick A. Pike, to obtain a decree declaring Gregory to be entitled, to the above funds as the proceeds of the note on which the judgment against Swift was rendered. ■The bill makes no reference to the fact that the fund in dispute was subject to the order of the court in equity suit No. 2170. This cause having been heard upon the pleadings and proofs, the bill of complaint was dismissed, with costs to be duly taxed. The Circuit Judge in an opinion disclosing the nature of the suit, and the facts' established by the evidence, held that the decision of the question whether Mrs. Pike, as executrix, had a lien on the Swift notes or their proceeds, to the extent of ,$25,000, “belongs to equity suit No. 2170, where all persons ■ claiming an interest in these , notes are made parties. The moneys in the possession of the defendants, the Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company and the Merchants’ National Bank,' eferred to in the bill of complaint herein, are held by ■them subject to the orders of this court in said equity suit No. 2170, and no order relating to said moneys can properly be made in this suit, which does not include as parties some of the persons who are parties in said equity suit No. 2170. The bill in this case should be dismissed, with costs.” 36 Fed. Bep. 408, 414.