TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Garrett v. United States

Garrett v. United States, 465 U.S. 1037 (1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 21, 1984
Docket
No. 83-6067
Citations
465 U.S. 1037104 S. Ct. 131179 L. Ed. 2d 70852 U.S.L.W. 36121984 U.S. LEXIS 1249
Cited by 40 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (noting that “ ‘where the correctness of the lower court’s decision depends upon a determination of fact which only a [fact-finder] could make but which has not been made, the appellate court cannot take the place of the [factfinder]’ ”)
    United States v. Hill, 131 F.3d 1056 (D.C. Cir. 1997)

Cited by 40 cases

View all citing references →
1984: 21985: 61986: 31987: 81988: 61989: 21990: 11991: 21992: 41994: 11995: 11996: 11997: 12002: 12015: 119842026peak 1987 · 8

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Harris497 N.E.2d 177 (Ill. App. Ct. 1986)
  2. United States of America, ex rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. Quinn14 F.3d 645 (D.C. Cir. 1994)
  3. United States v. Harris959 F.2d 246 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
  4. United States v. Frank G. Prantil764 F.2d 548 (9th Cir. 1985)
  5. United States v. Darlene Wilson835 F.2d 1440 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  6. Armco Steel Co., LP v. CSX Corp.790 F. Supp. 311 (D.D.C. 1991)

Most recent

  1. State v. MartinezNo. SC19198 Dissent (Conn. Dec. 1, 2015)
  2. United States v. Richards56 M.J. 282 (C.A.A.F. 2002) · Concurrence
  3. United States v. Hill, William D.131 F.3d 1056 (D.C. Cir. 1997)
  4. United States v. Tyrone N. Walker99 F.3d 439 (D.C. Cir. 1996)
  5. United States v. Watt911 F. Supp. 538 (D.D.C. 1995)
  6. United States of America, ex rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. Quinn14 F.3d 645 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list