In re Schneider
Opinion
148 U.S. 157 13 S.Ct. 572 37 L.Ed. 404
In re SCHNEIDER.
No. ____.
March 14, 1893.
Jeremiah M. Wilson, William F. Mattingly, and A. A. Hoehling, Jr., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 158-162 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.
1
The application for a writ of error or appeal is denied upon the authority of Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82 , 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 22; In re Heath, 144 U. S. 92 , 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 615; In re Cross, 146 U. S. 271 , 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 109; Cross v. U. S., 145 U. S. 571 , 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 842. See, also, Railroad Co. v. Grant, 98 U. S. 398 ; Dennison v. Alexander, 103 U. S. 522 ; U. S. v. Wanamaker, 147 U. S. 149 , 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 279.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.