Skip to content

Jacobs v. George

Jacobs v. George, 150 U.S. 415 (1893)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: November 27, 1893
Docket: No. 87
Judges: The Chief Justice:
Citations: 150 U.S. 41514 S. Ct. 15937 L. Ed. 11271893 U.S. LEXIS 2390

Cited by 44

Syllabus

When an appeal is allowed in open court, and perfected during the term at which the decree or judgment appealed from, was rendered, no citation is necessary. When an appeal is allowed at the term of the decree or judgment, but is not perfected until after the term, a citation is necessary to bring in the parties; but if the appeal be docketed here at the next ensuing term, or the record reaches the clerk’s hands seasonably for that term, and legal excuse exists for lack of docketing, a citation may be.issued, by leave of this court, although the time for taking the appeal has elapsed. When an appeal is allowed at a term subsequent to that of the decree or judgment appealed from, a citation is necessary; but it may be issued, properly returnable even after the expiration of the time .for taking the appeal, if the allowance of the appeal-were made before. A citation is one of the necessary elements of an appeal taken after the term, and if it be not issued and served before the end of the next ensuing term of this court, and be not waived, the appeal becomes inoperative.

Summary

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. The case is stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

The Chibe Justice:

Judgment in this case was rendered by the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona, January 19, 1889, that the judgment of the court below under review by that court be reversed and the complaint dismissed with costs.

January 13, 1890, being- one. of the days of the next regular term of the court, an appeal was prayed to this court, the appeal was allowed January 14, 1890, conditioned on giving bond, and certain findings of the Supreme Court were filed that' day. January 24, 1890, the required bond was approved and filed, and the record was filed here, March 14, 1890, at October term, 1889. No citation was issued and served, nor has any appearance for appellee been entered, nor is any waiver of citation shown.

It must be regarded as settled that: (1) Where an appeal is allowed in open court, and perfected during the term at which the decree or'judgment appealed from was rendered, no citation is necessary ; (2) Where the appeal is allowed at the term of'the decree or judgment, but not perfected until after the term, a citation is necessary to bring in the parties; but if the appeal be docketed here at our next ensuing term, or the record reaches the clerk’s hands seasonably for that term, and legal excuse exists for lack of docketing, a citation may be issued by leave of this court, although the time for taking the *417 appeal has elapsed; (3) Where the appeal is allowed at a term subsequent to that' of the decree or judgment, a citation is necessary, but may be issued properly returnable, even after the expiration of the time for taking the appeal, if the allowance of' the appeal were before; (4) But a citation is one of the necessary elements of an appeal taken after the term, and if it is not issued and served before the end of the next ensuing term of this court, and not waived, the appeal becomes inoperative.

Hewitt v. Filbert, 116 U. S. 142 ;

Richardson v. Green, 130 U. S. 104 ;

Evans v. State Bank, 134 U. S. 330 ;

Green v. Elbert, 137 U. S. 615 .

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 44 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Hunn v. Lewis25 F.2d 271 (8th Cir. 1928)
Berliner Gramophone Co. v. Seaman108 F. 714 (4th Cir. 1901)
Pueblo De Taos v. Archuleta64 F.2d 807 (10th Cir. 1933)
American Baptist Home Mission Soc. v. Barnett26 F.2d 350 (2d Cir. 1928)
Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Mulber Oil Co.38 F.2d 396 (10th Cir. 1930)
Weinstein v. Black Diamond SS Corporation31 F.2d 519 (2d Cir. 1929)

Most recent

United States v. Sentinel Fire Ins. Co.178 F.2d 217 (5th Cir. 1949)
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Kern County83 F.2d 774 (9th Cir. 1936)
United States v. Hibbard83 F.2d 785 (9th Cir. 1936)
Baez v. People of Puerto Rico82 F.2d 317 (1st Cir. 1936)
President Arthur72 F.2d 276 (2d Cir. 1934)
Wake Development Co. v. Auburn-Fuller Co.71 F.2d 706 (9th Cir. 1934)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Evans v. State Bank, 134 U.S. 330 (1890)	41
	Green v. Elbert, 137 U.S. 615 (1891)	37
	Richardson v. Green, 130 U.S. 104 (1889)	34
	Hewitt v. Filbert, 116 U.S. 142 (1885)	33