TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Keokuk & Western Railroad v. Scotland County

Keokuk and Western Railroad Company v. Scotland County

Keokuk & Western R.R. v. Scotland Cnty., 152 U.S. 317 (1894)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 12, 1894
Docket
No. 183
Judges
Brown, Harlan, Brewer
Citations
152 U.S. 31714 S. Ct. 60838 L. Ed. 4571894 U.S. LEXIS 2120
Syllabus
Keokuk & Western Railroad Company v. Missouri, ante, 801, followed.
Summary
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. This was a bill to enjoin the county courts and collectors of revenue for the counties of Clarke, Scotland, and Schuyler, in the State of Missouri, from levying and collecting taxes on the railway property owned by the plaintiff in these counties.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Brown

Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court.

*318 This case differs from the one just decided, ante, 301, only in the fact that this is a bill in equity, filed by the corporation whose property is sought to be taxed, to restrain the defendants from levying or collecting any taxes for the years 1883 to 1887, inclusive, upon the ground that the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in the Seoor ease, and also the Supreme Court of the State, had held the property of the company not to be subject to taxation.

As the questions involved in the two cases are precisely the same, the decree of the court below dismissing the bill was correct, and the same is, therefore, Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Brewer dissented.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1959: 119592026peak 1959 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. E. A. Wight v. R. J. Chandler264 F.2d 249 (10th Cir. 1959)

Most recent

  1. E. A. Wight v. R. J. Chandler264 F.2d 249 (10th Cir. 1959)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list