TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Accident Society v. Spiro

Nat'l Accident Soc'y v. Spiro, 164 U.S. 281 (1896)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 30, 1896
Docket
No. 460
Judges
Brewer, Peokham
Citations
164 U.S. 28117 S. Ct. 99641 L. Ed. 4351896 U.S. LEXIS 1859
Syllabus
A defendant, by filing a petition in a state court for removal of the cause to the United States court, in general terms, unaccompanied by a plea in abatement, and without specifying or restricting the purpose of his appearance, does not thereby waive' objection to the jurisdiction of the court for want of sufficient service of the summons.
Summary
certificate from the circuit court of appeals for the SIXTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

The Chief Justice :

This is a certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth- Circuit, propounding, after a preliminary statement, the following question:

“ Does a defendant by filing a petition in a state court for removal of the cause to the United States court, in general terms, unaccompanied by a plea in abatement, and without specifying or restricting the purpose of his appearance, thereby waive objection to the jurisdiction of the court for' want of' sufficient service of the summons ? ”

For the reasons given and on the authorities cited in the case of Wabash Western Railway v. Brow, ante, 271, the question must be answered in the negative.

Certificate accordingly.

Mr. Justice Brewer and Mr. Justice Peokham dissented.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1897: 41902: 11904: 11911: 11913: 11924: 11930: 11932: 11945: 118972026peak 1897 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Caceres v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.299 F. 968 (E.D.N.Y. 1924)
  2. First Nat. Bank v. Louisiana Tax Commission143 So. 23 (La. 1932)
  3. Paul v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad69 N.E. 1024 (Ind. Ct. App. 1904)
  4. Baker v. Union Stock Yards National Bank89 N.W. 269 (Neb. 1902)
  5. Horton v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad78 S.E. 494 (N.C. 1913)
  6. National Acc. Soc. v. Spiro78 F. 774 (6th Cir. 1897)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list