Lumberman's Bank v. Huston
Lumberman’s Bank v. Huston
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
Mr. Justice Hablan delivered the opinion of the court.
The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff' in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined *204 in Twin City National Bank v. Nebeker, just decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment is Mr. John J. Crawford for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Solicitor General for defendant in error.
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice White concurred in the result.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.