TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dodge v. Menasha Wood Split-Pulley Co.

Dodge v. Menasha Wood Split-Pulley Co., 169 U.S. 738 (1898)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 28, 1898
Docket
No. 602
Citations
169 U.S. 73818 S. Ct. 94142 L. Ed. 12171898 U.S. LEXIS 2379

Opinion

169 U.S. 738 18 S.Ct. 941 42 L.Ed. 1217

DODGE et al. v. MENASHA WOOD SPLIT-PULLEY CO. et al.

No. 602.

March 28, 1898.

Lysander Hill, for petitioners.

William F. Vilas, for respondents.

1

Edward Rector filed brief in opposition to petition by leave of court.

2

No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Seventh circuit denied. See 30 C. C. A. 455 , 86 Fed. 904 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 119452026peak 1945 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Smoot152 F.2d 667 (D.C. Cir. 1945)

Most recent

  1. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Smoot152 F.2d 667 (D.C. Cir. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Menasha Wood Split Pulley Co. v. Dodge, 86 F. 904 (7th Cir. 1898) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list