TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Deposit Bank of Owensboro v. Owensboro

Deposit Bank of Owensboro v. City of Owensboro

Deposit Bank of Owensboro v. Owensboro, 173 U.S. 662 (1899)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 3, 1899
Docket
No. 149
Judges
White
Citations
173 U.S. 66219 S. Ct. 87543 L. Ed. 8501899 U.S. LEXIS 1468
Summary
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. This case was argued with the Citizens’ Savings Bank case.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — White

Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court, The relief sought by the plaintiff in error was the nullity of certain taxes levied by the city of Owensboro for the years 1893 and 1894. The grounds . upon which this relief was prayed are in all material respects like unto those relied on in the two cases against the city of Owensboro, just decided. The charter and an amendment extending the same were both enacted after the act of 1856.

Indeed, this case along with the other two were disposed of by the Kentucky Court of Appeals in the same opinion, because of the identity of the questions presented, For reasons given in the opinion in Citizens’ Savings *663 Bank of Owensboro v. Owensboro, ante, 636, this term, the decree is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1911: 11947: 11960: 119112026peak 1911 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United States162 F.2d 849 (1st Cir. 1947)
  2. Perkins v. Coffin79 A. 1070 (Conn. 1911)
  3. Jose Tavares v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue275 F.2d 369 (1st Cir. 1960)

Most recent

  1. Jose Tavares v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue275 F.2d 369 (1st Cir. 1960)
  2. Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United States162 F.2d 849 (1st Cir. 1947)
  3. Perkins v. Coffin79 A. 1070 (Conn. 1911)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list