TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Goetze v. United States

Goetze v. United States, 182 U.S. 221 (1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 27, 1901
Docket
Nos. 340 and 515
Judges
Brown, After Making the Above Statement
Citations
182 U.S. 22121 S. Ct. 74245 L. Ed. 10651901 U.S. LEXIS 1226

Opinion

182 U.S. 221 (1901)

GOETZE

v.

UNITED STATES.

CROSSMAN

v.

UNITED STATES.

Nos. 340 and 515.

Supreme Court of United States.

The two were decided together May 27, 1901. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Mr. Edward C. Perkins and Mr. Everit Brown for appellant in No. 340. Mr. J.B. Henderson also filed a brief for same. Mr. E. Ham, Mr. Alexander Porter Morse and Mr. Charles F. Manderson filed a brief in this case on behalf of industrial interests in the States.

Mr. Attorney General for the United States.

Mr. W. Wickham Smith for appellants in No. 515. Mr. Charles Curie was on his brief.

Mr. Solicitor General for the United States.

Nos. 340 was argued December 17, 18, 19, 20, 1900; No. 515 was argued January 14, 15, 1901.

MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

As the sole question presented by the record in these cases was whether Porto Rico and the Hawaiian Islands were foreign countries within the meaning of the tariff laws, we must hold, *222 for the reasons stated in De Lima v. Bidwell, just decided, that the board of general appraisers had no jurisdiction of the cases.

The judgments of the Circuit Court are therefore reversed, and the cases remanded to that court with instructions to reverse the action of the board of general appraisers.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 28 cases

View all citing references →
1901: 11910: 21917: 11929: 11934: 21975: 11998: 22000: 12002: 12003: 12005: 12008: 12010: 42011: 22013: 12015: 12016: 22019: 22020: 119012026peak 2010 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jake King v. Honorable Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior of the United States520 F.2d 1140 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  2. United States v. Pollard209 F. Supp. 2d 525 (D.V.I. 2002)
  3. United States v. Lebrón-Caceres157 F. Supp. 3d 80 (D.P.R. 2016)
  4. Igartúa v. United States626 F.3d 592 (1st Cir. 2010) · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part
  5. Igartua-De-La-Rosa v. United States417 F.3d 145 (1st Cir. 2005)
  6. Aurelius Inv., LLC v. Puerto Rico915 F.3d 838 (1st Cir. 2019)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Cotto-Flores970 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2020)
  2. Peña Martínez v. Azar376 F. Supp. 3d 191 (2019)
  3. Aurelius Inv., LLC v. Puerto Rico915 F.3d 838 (1st Cir. 2019)
  4. Vidal v. Garcia-Padilla167 F. Supp. 3d 279 (D.P.R. 2016)
  5. United States v. Lebrón-Caceres157 F. Supp. 3d 80 (D.P.R. 2016)
  6. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Sánchez Valle192 P.R. Dec. 594 (2015)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list