TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hood v. Wallace

Hood v. Wallace, 182 U.S. 555 (1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 27, 1901
Docket
No. 179
Judges
Harlan
Citations
182 U.S. 55521 S. Ct. 88545 L. Ed. 12271901 U.S. LEXIS 1242
Syllabus
Lantry v. Wallace, ante 536, followed.
Summary
error to the circuit court oe appeals for the eighth circuit. The case is stated in the opinion. The counsel were the same as in Lantry v. Wallace, and the two cases were argued together.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Harlan

Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court.

The pleadings in this case are the same as in Lantry v. Wallace, just decided. The demurrer to the answer and cross-petition of Hood was sustained in an elaborate opinion by Judge Phillips, holding the Circuit Court. 89 Fed. Rep. 11. The *556 judgment in that court was affirmed in the Circuit Court of Appeals.

Lantry v. Wallace, 97 Fed. Rep. 865.

For the reasons stated in the opinion just rendered in Laritry’s case, the judgment in this case is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1908: 11914: 11925: 11926: 11928: 11934: 119082026peak 1908 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.148 N.E. 609 (Mass. 1925)
  2. Gallin v. National City Bank152 Misc. 679 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1934)
  3. Williams v. Stone25 F.2d 831 (4th Cir. 1928)
  4. Jackman v. Continental Nat. Bank16 F.2d 728 (8th Cir. 1926)
  5. Scott v. Abbott160 F. 573 (8th Cir. 1908)
  6. Salter v. Williams219 F. 1017 (D.N.J. 1914)

Most recent

  1. Gallin v. National City Bank152 Misc. 679 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1934)
  2. Williams v. Stone25 F.2d 831 (4th Cir. 1928)
  3. Jackman v. Continental Nat. Bank16 F.2d 728 (8th Cir. 1926)
  4. Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.148 N.E. 609 (Mass. 1925)
  5. Salter v. Williams219 F. 1017 (D.N.J. 1914)
  6. Scott v. Abbott160 F. 573 (8th Cir. 1908)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list