TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank

Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank, 186 U.S. 177 (1902)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 2, 1902
Docket
No. 3r
Judges
The Chief Justice. This is an Application for Leave to Prosecute a Writ of Error to a State Court
Citations
186 U.S. 17722 S. Ct. 81146 L. Ed. 11111902 U.S. LEXIS 884
Cited by 4
Syllabus
The act of Congress of July 20, 1892, 27 Stat. 252, has no application to proceedings in this court.
Summary
MOTION TO SUE OUT WRIT OF ERROR; WITHOUT GIVING BOND REQUIRED BY LAW. The case is stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

The Chief Justice.

This is an application for leave to prosecute a writ of erroi; to a state court, without giving security *178 as required by section 1000 of the Revised Statutes, under an act of Congress of July 20,. 1892. 27 Stat. 252 .

. The motion must be denied. Our ruling has uniformly been, and has been enforced in repeated instances that that act has no application to proceedings in this court.

Motion denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →
1904: 11911: 11941: 11963: 119042026peak 1904 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H314 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1963)
  2. Old Colony Railroad v. Assessors of Boston35 N.E.2d 246 (Mass. 1941)
  3. Bradford v. Southern Railway Co.195 U.S. 243 (1904)
  4. Horrabin v. City of Iowa City160 Iowa 650 (1911)

Most recent

  1. Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H314 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1963)
  2. Old Colony Railroad v. Assessors of Boston35 N.E.2d 246 (Mass. 1941)
  3. Horrabin v. City of Iowa City160 Iowa 650 (1911)
  4. Bradford v. Southern Railway Co.195 U.S. 243 (1904)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list