TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Missouri Valley Land Co. v. Wrich

Missouri Valley Land Company v. Wrich

Mo. Valley Land Co. v. Wrich, 208 U.S. 250 (1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 3, 1908
Docket
No. 102
Judges
White
Citations
208 U.S. 25028 S. Ct. 29952 L. Ed. 4731908 U.S. LEXIS 1437
Summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. The facts are stated in the opinion.'

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — White

Mr. Justice White, delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was argued with Missouri Valley Land Co.

v. Wiese, No. 101, of this term, just decided, ante, p. 234, and in all essential particulars the two cases are alike., Wrich purchased, his land in 1881 from the Union Pacific Railroad Company and received his deed in 1890.. The land lay within overlap grants to the- Unión Pacific Company and the Sioux City and Pacific Railroad Company. Wrich took possession immediately after his purchase, and ever afterwards held and claimed' the land as his own. In September, 1893, he under *251 took to make a cash entry of the land under the act of 1887, as did his neighbor Wiese. All the questions involved in the Wiese case are present in this, and, for the reasons given in the opinion in the former-, the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nebraska in this case must be Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1909: 11912: 119092026peak 1909 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Boe v. Arnold102 P. 290 (Or. 1909)
  2. Pioneer Mining Co. v. Pacific Coal Co.4 Alaska 463 (D. Alaska 1912)

Most recent

  1. Pioneer Mining Co. v. Pacific Coal Co.4 Alaska 463 (D. Alaska 1912)
  2. Boe v. Arnold102 P. 290 (Or. 1909)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list