Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Railway v. Lightheiser
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Railway Company, in Error v. George W. Lightheiser. No 141. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Railway Company, in Error v. Thomas Collins. No 142. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Railway Company, in Error v. William R. Ross. No 178. Supreme Court of the United States December 7, 1908 Mr. Allen Zollars for in Error. Mr. Stewart T. McConnell for in Error. Djq Per Curiam: Writs of Error Severally Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & W. R. Co. 175 U. S. 348, 44 L. Ed. 192, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 136 Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Ind. 438, 78 N. E. 1033 Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Collins, 168 Ind. 467, 80 N. E. 415 Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Ross, 169 Ind. 3, 80 N. E. 845. Clevenger v. Chaney [29sct688,212us562,53led652] 29 S.CT. 688 212 U.S. 562 53 L.ED. 652 E. E. Clevenger, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Etc. v. Allen Chaney. No 221. E. E. Clevenger, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Etc. v. James D. Lyle. No 222. E. E. Clevenger, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Etc. v. Emily M. Nichols. No 223
Opinion
212 U.S. 560 29 S.Ct. 688 53 L.Ed. 652
PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. GEORGE W. LIGHTHEISER. NO 141. PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. THOMAS COLLINS. NO 142. PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILLIAM R. ROSS. NO 178. Supreme Court of the United States December 7, 1908 Mr. Allen Zollars for plaintiff in error. Mr. Stewart T. McConnell for defendants in error. djQ Per Curiam: Writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & W. R. Co. 175 U. S. 348 , 44 L. ed. 192, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 136; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Ind. 438 , 78 N. E. 1033 ; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Collins, 168 Ind. 467 , 80 N. E. 415 ; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Ross, 169 Ind. 3 , 80 N. E. 845 . Clevenger v. Chaney [29SCt688,212US562,53LEd652] 29 S.Ct. 688 212 U.S. 562 53 L.Ed. 652 E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant, v. ALLEN CHANEY. NO 221. E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant, v. JAMES D. LYLE. NO 222. E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant, v. EMILY M. NICHOLS. NO 223.
Nos. 221, 222, and 223
December 14, 1908.
1
Messrs. E. E. Clevenger and Cook Danford for appellant.
2
Mr. A. H. Mitchell for appellees.
3
Per Curiam: Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Applications for Certiorari denied. Chapman v. Bowen, 207 U. S. 89 , 52 L. ed. 116, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 32.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.