Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Ventura Munich Ramon Valdes, in Error v
Opinion
212 U.S. 568 29 S.Ct. 692 53 L.Ed. 654
RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error, v. VENTURA MUNICH RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error, v. O. M. WOOD RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error, v. MARIA VENEGA PERIANES
No. 457.
No. 473.
No. 474.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 1, 1909 1
Messrs. F. Kingsbury Curtis, John G. Carlisle, and Henry A. Stickney for plaintiff in error.
2
Mr. Willis Sweet for defendants in error.
3
Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, chap. 191, 31 Stat. at L. 77, §§ 34, 35; act of March 2, 1901, chap. 812, 31 Stat. at L. 953, § 3; Royal Ins. Co. v. Martin, 192 U. S. 149, 159 , 48 L. ed. 385, 388, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U. S. 339 , 50 L. ed. 1055, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U. S. 80 , 50 L. ed. 942, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Garrozi v. Dastas, 204 U. S. 64, 73 , 51 L. ed. 369, 376, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.