TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

International Mercantile Marine Co. v. Stranahan

International Mercantile Marine Company v. Stranahan; Same v. Same

Int'l Mercantile Marine Co. v. Stranahan, 214 U.S. 344 (1909)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 1, 1909
Docket
Nos. 510, 511
Judges
White
Citations
214 U.S. 34429 S. Ct. 67853 L. Ed. 10241909 U.S. LEXIS 1922
Syllabus
Decided on the authority of the' preceding case.
Summary
IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR. THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The facts are stated.in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — White

Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court.

These writs of error are prosecuted to obtain the reversal of judgments entered in favor of the United States in actions brought to recover back sums paid as penalties imposed and collected under authority of § 9 of the Immigration Act of March 3,1903. One action concerned penalties exacted before and. the other related to a penalty which attached after the promulgation by the Secretary of Commerce and Labor of a certain rule of procedure known as circular No. 58. . As the controversies in these cases are. of. the same nature as that presented by the record in Oceanic Steam Navigation Company, Limited, v. The United States, No. 509, just decided, ante, p. 320, and as the principles which controlled the decision in that case are here absolutely decisive, the judgments in these cases must be, and they are, Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1911: 11921: 11932: 11997: 12010: 12011: 119112026peak 1911 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Boone v. Metts88 So. 125 (Miss. 1921) · Dissent
  2. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission219 U.S. 498 (1911)
  3. Lloyd Royal Belge Societe Anonyme v. Elting61 F.2d 745 (2d Cir. 1932)
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Attorney General v. Shelly Holding Co.946 N.E.2d 295 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)
  5. Rodriguez v. United States983 F. Supp. 1445 (S.D. Fla. 1997)
  6. State ex rel. Cordray v. Morrow Sanitary Co.2011 Ohio 2690

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Cordray v. Morrow Sanitary Co.2011 Ohio 2690
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Attorney General v. Shelly Holding Co.946 N.E.2d 295 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)
  3. Rodriguez v. United States983 F. Supp. 1445 (S.D. Fla. 1997)
  4. Lloyd Royal Belge Societe Anonyme v. Elting61 F.2d 745 (2d Cir. 1932)
  5. State ex rel. Boone v. Metts88 So. 125 (Miss. 1921) · Dissent
  6. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission219 U.S. 498 (1911)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list