TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Minnesota

St. Paul v. Minnesota, 214 U.S. 497 (1909)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 26, 1909
Docket
No. 162
Citations
214 U.S. 49729 S. Ct. 69853 L. Ed. 10601909 U.S. LEXIS 1935

Opinion

214 U.S. 497 (1909)

ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY

v.

STATE OF MINNESOTA ex rel. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.

No. 162.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 19, 20, 1909. Decided April 26, 1909. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.

*498 Mr. Rome G. Brown, with whom Mr. Charles S. Albert and Mr. William R. Begg were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Frank Healy, with whom Mr. Albert E. Clarke was on the brief, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam:

Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern Pacific Railway Company v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Duluth, 208 U.S. 583 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1910: 11915: 21917: 11918: 21926: 11934: 11949: 219102026peak 1915 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA ex rel. THE CITY OF DULUTH, 208 U.S. 583 (1908) 125

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list