TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kenyon v. FOWLER

Kenyon v. Fowler, Receiver of American Exchange National Bank of Syracuse

Kenyon v. Fowler, 215 U.S. 593 (1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 24, 1910
Docket
No. 87
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
215 U.S. 59330 S. Ct. 40954 L. Ed. 3411910 U.S. LEXIS 1866
Cited by 9
Syllabus
Judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals affirming a judgment of .the District Court for an assessment of stock of an insolvent national bank máde by ,thé Comptroller, affirmed without opinion.
Summary
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.

Keyser v. Hitz, 133 U. S. 138 ;

Finn v. Brown, 142 U. S. 56 ;

Richmond v. Irons, 121 U. S. 27 ;

Matteson v. Dent, 176 U. S. 521 . Opinion below, 155 Fed. Rep. 107;

S. C., 83 C. C. A. 567 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 9 cases

View all citing references →
1916: 11917: 11925: 11926: 11936: 21937: 11938: 219162026peak 1936 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Chapman v. Pettus269 S.W. 268 (Tex. App. 1925)
  2. Austin v. Marsico281 S.W. 198 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1926)
  3. Williams v. Vreeland244 F. 346 (3d Cir. 1917)
  4. Holmberg v. Anchell24 F. Supp. 594 (S.D.N.Y. 1938)
  5. Brusselback v. Cago Corporation24 F. Supp. 524 (S.D.N.Y. 1938)
  6. Cheairs v. Stollenwerck168 So. 589 (Ala. 1936)

Most recent

  1. Holmberg v. Anchell24 F. Supp. 594 (S.D.N.Y. 1938)
  2. Brusselback v. Cago Corporation24 F. Supp. 524 (S.D.N.Y. 1938)
  3. Todd v. Russell20 F. Supp. 936 (S.D.N.Y. 1937)
  4. Willing v. Jensen17 F. Supp. 596 (E.D. Pa. 1936)
  5. Cheairs v. Stollenwerck168 So. 589 (Ala. 1936)
  6. Austin v. Marsico281 S.W. 198 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Richmond v. Irons, 121 U.S. 27 (1887) 290
Keyser v. Hitz, 133 U.S. 138 (1890) 123
Matteson v. Dent, 176 U.S. 521 (1900) 107
Finn v. Brown, 142 U.S. 56 (1891) 48
Kenyon v. Fowler, 155 F. 107 (2d Cir. 1907) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list