TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Florida ex rel. Wailes v. Croom

State of Florida on the Relation of Wailes v. Croom, Comptroller of the State of Florida

Fla. ex rel. Wailes v. Croom, 226 U.S. 309 (1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
December 16, 1912
Docket
No. 646
Judges
White
Citations
226 U.S. 30933 S. Ct. 10957 L. Ed. 2351912 U.S. LEXIS 2155
Syllabus
Where it appears, although by evidence outside the record, that before the writ of error to the state court was sued out, the public officer against' whom a writ of mandamus is prayed had died, and his successor had qualified, the writ will be dismissed.
Summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. The facts are stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — White

Memorandum opinion, by direction of the court, by Mr. Chief Justice White.

This is an action in mandamus. The party proceeded against in the state court was A. C. Croom, sued in his official character as comptroller of the State of Florida. On January 16, 1912, the Supreme Court of Florida affirmed a judgment denying the writ. On April 11, 1912, this writ of error was sued out by the relator below, and Croom, comptroller, was named as defendant in error. Citation was served by delivering a copy to the Attorney General of the State of Florida. • The attorneys who represented the defendant in the state courts, acting as friends of the court, have placed upon the files evidence establishing that A. C. Croom died on February 7, 1912, and that William V. Knott was thereafter appointed and duly qualified as comptroller of the State of Florida, and has been acting as such since February 17, 1912. Under the circumstances thus detailed it results that the writ of error was improvidently sued out, and it must therefore be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 11954: 21980: 119302026peak 1954 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Davis v. Preston280 U.S. 406 (1930)
  2. Zequeira v. La Universidad de Puerto Rico76 P.R. Dec. 338 (1954)
  3. Riverside Memorial Mausoleum v. UMET Trust32 Pa. D. & C.3d 472 (1980)
  4. Zequeira v. University of Puerto Rico76 P.R. 316 (1954)

Most recent

  1. Riverside Memorial Mausoleum v. UMET Trust32 Pa. D. & C.3d 472 (1980)
  2. Zequeira v. University of Puerto Rico76 P.R. 316 (1954)
  3. Zequeira v. La Universidad de Puerto Rico76 P.R. Dec. 338 (1954)
  4. Davis v. Preston280 U.S. 406 (1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list