TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Mesa

United States v. Mesa, 228 U.S. 533 (1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 5, 1913
Docket
No. 864
Judges
White
Citations
228 U.S. 53333 S. Ct. 59757 L. Ed. 9531913 U.S. LEXIS 2394
Syllabus
Decided on authority of preceding case.
Summary
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR- THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. The facts are stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — White

Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error was indicted upon the charge that within the jurisdiction of the court he “did unlawfully, knowingly, wilfully and with intent to export the munitions of war hereinafter described from the said city of El Paso to Ciudad Juarez, in Mexico, make a certain shipment of certain munitions of war, to-wit: three thousand (3,000) Winchester rifle cartridges of the calibre 44; that is to say,' did make a shipment of said munitions of war from said city of El Paso and with said Ciudad Juarez, in Mexico, as the destination of said shipment, by transporting the same in a wagon from a point,” etc.

*534 A demurrer to the indictment was heard along with the demurrer to the indictment in the case against Chavez, which we have just decided. The demurrer was sustained and the indictment quashed upon the opinion rendered in the Chavez Case.

The ruling which we have just made in that case is therefore applicable to this and necessitates a reversal.

Judgment reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1913: 11920: 119132026peak 1913 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Simpson252 U.S. 465 (1920)
  2. Talbott v. United States208 F. 144 (5th Cir. 1913)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Simpson252 U.S. 465 (1920)
  2. Talbott v. United States208 F. 144 (5th Cir. 1913)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list