TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citizens' Telephone Co. of Jackson v. Fuller

Citizens' Telephone Company of Jackson v. Fuller, Auditor General of the State of Michigan

Citizens' Tel. Co. of Jackson v. Fuller, 229 U.S. 335 (1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 10, 1913
Docket
No. 285
Judges
McKenna
Citations
229 U.S. 33533 S. Ct. 83757 L. Ed. 12151913 U.S. LEXIS 2447
Syllabus
Decided on authority of preceding case. -
Summary
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES, POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. The facts are stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — McKenna

Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant is a telephone company, located at the City of Jackson, State of Michigan, doing an extensive' business: It brought this bill in equity to restrain the collection of a tax levied under the laws considered in the preceding case, Citizens’ Telephone Co.

v. Fuller, ante, p. 322. It is substantially like the bill in the latter case.

A demurrer was filed to the bill and, being overruled, an answer was filed. After hearing, a decree was entered dismissing the bill. This appeal was then taken.

The questions presented are the same as those presented in the preceding case and were submitted at the same time and on the same argument. On- the -authority of the opinion in that cáse the decree is Affirmed,

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1992: 119922026peak 1992 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Medlock v. Leathers842 S.W.2d 428 (Ark. 1992)

Most recent

  1. Medlock v. Leathers842 S.W.2d 428 (Ark. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list