TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company, in Error v. Greenwald & Champenois, a Partnership, Etc

Mobile & Ohio R.R. Co., in Error v. Greenwald & Champenois, a P'ship, Etc, 235 U.S. 717 (1914)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
August 17, 1914
Docket
No. 207
Citations
235 U.S. 71735 S. Ct. 19759 L. Ed. 4381914 U.S. LEXIS 1099

Opinion

235 U.S. 717 35 S.Ct. 197 59 L.Ed. 438

MOBILE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. GREENWALD & CHAMPENOIS, a Partnership, etc.

No. 207.

Supreme Court of the United States

August 17, 1914 1

Messrs. L. E. Jeffiries and S. R. Prince for plaintiff in error.

2

No appearance for defendant in error.

3

Dismissed pursuant to the Twenty-eighth Rule.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 11946: 11962: 11967: 11979: 11981: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. United Air Lines, Inc.216 F. Supp. 709 (D. Nev. 1962)
  2. Lloyd L. Hayes, Hayes, Inc. v. T. G. Solomon, Gulf States Theatres, Inc.597 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1979)
  3. International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit Company373 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1967)
  4. Ratner v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.6 F.R.D. 618 (S.D.N.Y. 1942)
  5. Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore Co.640 F.2d 484 (4th Cir. 1981)
  6. Fisher v. Time, Inc.153 F.2d 806 (7th Cir. 1946)

Most recent

  1. Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore Co.640 F.2d 484 (4th Cir. 1981)
  2. Lloyd L. Hayes, Hayes, Inc. v. T. G. Solomon, Gulf States Theatres, Inc.597 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1979)
  3. International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit Company373 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1967)
  4. United States v. United Air Lines, Inc.216 F. Supp. 709 (D. Nev. 1962)
  5. Fisher v. Time, Inc.153 F.2d 806 (7th Cir. 1946)
  6. Ratner v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.6 F.R.D. 618 (S.D.N.Y. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list