Mutual Film Co. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
Mutual Film Company v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court.
This case, was submitted with. No. 456, just decided. In the latter case the complainant in the court below and appellant here was a corporation of Virginia. The appellant. in the pending case is a corporation of dhio, and counsel say “although there are some differences in the way in which their business is conducted, yet the questions involved are the same, the records in both cases are nearly identical,, and the court below treated them together, rendering the one opinion to cover both.” And counsel have submitted them on the same argument.
On the authority, therefore, of thé opinion in No. 456, the decree is Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.