TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 92

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 92. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 93. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 94. Chicago, Rock Island, & Pacific Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 95. St. Louis, Kansas City, & Colorado Railroad Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 96. Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 97. Missouri Pacific Pailway Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 98. St. Louis, Iron Mountain, & Southern Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 99. Missouri, Kansas, & Texas Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 100. Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 101. Chicago, Milwaukee, & St. Paul Railway Company v. Purblic Service Commission of Missouri No 102. Chicago & Alton Railroad Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri No 103

St. Louis & San Francisco R.R. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Mo. No 92, 239 U.S. 655 (1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
December 2, 1915
Docket
No. 92-103
Citations
239 U.S. 65536 S. Ct. 16760 L. Ed. 488

Opinion

239 U.S. 655 36 S.Ct. 167 60 L.Ed. 488

ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD COMPANY Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 92. ATCHISON, TOPEKA, & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 93. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 94. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND, & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 95. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY, & COLORADO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 96. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 97. MISSOURI PACIFIC PAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 98. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN, & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 99. MISSOURI, KANSAS, & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 100. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 101. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PURBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 102. CHICAGO & ALTON RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. NO 103.

Nos. 92-103.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 29, 1915 1

Messrs. Frank Hagerman and Edward J. White for appellants.

2

Messrs. John T. Barker and William G. Busby for appellees.

3

Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the appellant.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1916: 11938: 11951: 11952: 11953: 11958: 119162026peak 1916 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. William J. Deupree, Trustee, Etc. v. Alice P. Watson239 U.S. 656 (1916)
  2. United States v. David Ransom Heath260 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1958)
  3. National Cash Register Co. v. Ness282 N.W. 827 (Minn. 1938)
  4. Thomas v. Marvins Credit, Inc.81 A.2d 340 (D.C. 1951)
  5. Marvins Credit, Inc. v. Morgan87 A.2d 530 (D.C. 1952)
  6. Cutler v. Cooper96 A.2d 360 (D.C. 1953)

Most recent

  1. United States v. David Ransom Heath260 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1958)
  2. Cutler v. Cooper96 A.2d 360 (D.C. 1953)
  3. Marvins Credit, Inc. v. Morgan87 A.2d 530 (D.C. 1952)
  4. Thomas v. Marvins Credit, Inc.81 A.2d 340 (D.C. 1951)
  5. National Cash Register Co. v. Ness282 N.W. 827 (Minn. 1938)
  6. William J. Deupree, Trustee, Etc. v. Alice P. Watson239 U.S. 656 (1916)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list