Ignatius Timothy Tribich Lincoln v. James M. Power, Marshal, Etc
Opinion
241 U.S. 651 36 S.Ct. 721 60 L.Ed. 1222
IGNATIUS TIMOTHY TRIBICH LINCOLN, Appellant, v. JAMES M. POWER, Marshal, etc.
No. 793.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 1, 1916 Per Curiam:
1
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Re Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334 , 34 L. ed. 464, 466, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1031, 8 Am. Crim. Rep. 241; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508 , 40 L. ed. 787, 789, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 689; Bryant v. United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105 , 42 L. ed. 94, 95, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 744; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278 , 46 L. ed. 534, 541, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484, 12 Am. Crim. Rep. 424; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406, 407 , 54 L. ed. 253, 256, 257, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 131; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523 , 57 L. ed. 330, 332, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; (2) David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610 , 54 L. ed. 636, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co. 237 U. S. 580 , 59 L. ed. 1127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739; Manila Invest. Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31 , 60 L. ed. —, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 12.
2
Mr. Addison S. Pratt for appellant.
3
Mr. Charles Fox for appellee.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.