TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Norfolk-Southern Railroad v. Owens

Norfolk-Southern Railroad Company v. Owens

Norfolk-Southern R.R. v. Owens, 256 U.S. 565 (1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 1, 1921
Docket
No. 223
Judges
Brandeis
Citations
256 U.S. 56541 S. Ct. 59765 L. Ed. 10931921 U.S. LEXIS 1588
Syllabus
A railroad corporation, while its road was.under federal control, was . • not liable for a penalty prescribed by a state law, for delay in de- - livery of an intrastate shipment. Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. Ault, ante, 554. 178 N. Car. 325, reversed.
Summary
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREMeT'COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. The case is stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Brandeis

*566 Mr. Justice Brandéis delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes here on writ of certiorari ( 251 U. S. 550 ) to the Supreme Court of North Carolina, which affirmed (178 N. Car. 325) a judgment of $21 against the Norfolk-Southern Railroad Company in favor of Owens, a shipper. The amount was assessed under a statute of the State as a penalty for undue delay in making delivery of an intrastate'shipment made March 27, 1918. At that time the railroad was in the possession and control of the Government, and was being operated by the Director General under the Federal Control Act of March 21, 1918, c. 25, 40 Stat. 451 . The only question presented for decision is whether the company was liable for the penalty. We are of opinion that it was not, for the reasons stated in Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. Ault, decided this day, ante, 554.

Reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1922: 11923: 11924: 11931: 11932: 11989: 12010: 119222026peak 1922 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Commerce Federal Savings Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.872 F.2d 1240 (6th Cir. 1989)
  2. Mays v. Tennessee Valley Authority699 F. Supp. 2d 991 (E.D. Tenn. 2010)
  3. Southern Railway Company v. Commonwealth38 S.W.2d 696 (Ky. Ct. App. 1931)
  4. Hines v. Miniard94 So. 302 (Ala. 1922)
  5. Heidtmueller v. Louisville N. R. Co.98 So. 792 (Ala. 1924)
  6. Wabash Railway Co. v. Elliott261 U.S. 457 (1923)

Most recent

  1. Mays v. Tennessee Valley Authority699 F. Supp. 2d 991 (E.D. Tenn. 2010)
  2. Commerce Federal Savings Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.872 F.2d 1240 (6th Cir. 1989)
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. Kentucky284 U.S. 338 (1932)
  4. Southern Railway Company v. Commonwealth38 S.W.2d 696 (Ky. Ct. App. 1931)
  5. Heidtmueller v. Louisville N. R. Co.98 So. 792 (Ala. 1924)
  6. Wabash Railway Co. v. Elliott261 U.S. 457 (1923)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list