TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 356 U.S. 41 (1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 17, 1958
Docket
No. 799
Judges
Whittaker
Citations
356 U.S. 4178 S. Ct. 6712 L. Ed. 2d 5711958 U.S. LEXIS 1353

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. We hold that the proofs were sufficient to submit to the jury the question whether employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner’s injury.

Wilkerson v. McCarthy, 336 U. S. 53 ;

Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500 ;

Webb v. Illinois Central R. Co., 352 U. S. 512 ;

Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 353 U. S. 920 ;

Futrelle v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 353 U. S. 920 ;

Deen v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co., 353 U. S. 925 ;

Thomson v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 353 U. S. 926 ;

Arnold v. Panhandle & S. F. R. Co., 353 U. S. 360 ;

Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & O. R. Co., 354 U. S. 901 ;

McBride v. Toledo Terminal R. Co., 354 U. S. 517 ;

Gibson v. Thompson, 355 U. S. 18 ;

Honeycutt v. Wabash R. Co., 355 U. S. 424 . The judgment of the Supreme Court of Missouri is *42 reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the result for the reasons given in his memorandum in Gibson v. Thompson, 355 U. S. 18 .

For the reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524 , Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice Whittaker dissents.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 30 cases

View all citing references →
1958: 41959: 41961: 31970: 11972: 11989: 11992: 11994: 21996: 31998: 11999: 12001: 22002: 32003: 22004: 119582026peak 1958 · 4

Most recent

  1. Luy v. Baltimore Police Department326 F. Supp. 2d 682 (D. Maryland 2004)
  2. Estate of Molina-Velez v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.286 F. Supp. 2d 185 (D.P.R. 2003)
  3. Pirraglia v. Novell, Inc.339 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 2003)
  4. Swartz v. Beach229 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (D. Wyo. 2002)
  5. Houbigant, Inc. v. Development Specialists, Inc.229 F. Supp. 2d 208 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)
  6. DIETL v. Mirage Resorts, Inc.180 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (D. Nev. 2002)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 12

DepthCaseCited by
Rogers v. Mo. Pac. R.R., 352 U.S. 500 (1957) 1,464
Gibson v. Thompson, 355 U.S. 18 (1957) 42
Wilkerson v. McCarthy, 336 U.S. 53 (1949) 395
Webb v. Ill. Cent. R.R., 352 U.S. 512 (1957) 90
Arnold v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 353 U.S. 360 (1957) 68
Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 354 U.S. 901 (1957) 41
Shaw v. Atl. Coast Line R.R., 353 U.S. 920 (1957) 33
Deen v. Gulf, Colo. & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 353 U.S. 925 (1957) 26
McBride v. Toledo Terminal R.R., 354 U.S. 517 (1957) 26
Honeycutt v. Wabash Ry. Co., 355 U.S. 424 (1958) 16
Thomson v. Tex. & Pac. Ry. Co., 353 U.S. 926 (1957) 14
Futrelle v. Atl. Coast Line R.R., 353 U.S. 920 (1957) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list