TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stanfield v. Forrest Five to Five Dollar Stores

STANFIELD v. FORREST FIVE TO FIVE DOLLAR STORES (Two Cases)

Stanfield v. Forrest Five to Five Dollar Stores, 99 S.E.2d 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 1, 1957
Docket
Nos. 36669, 36670
Judges
Felton, Quillian, Nichols
Citations
99 S.E.2d 16795 Ga. App. 7391957 Ga. App. LEXIS 903

Opinion — Felton

Felton, C. J.

This is not a clear and indisputable case that can be resolved as a matter of law. The object which caused the plaintiff to fall was not so bulky or so generally expected to be in the place where she was injured. The plaintiff alleged that the object was concealed because of poor lighting and that her attention was partially diverted by the wares displayed on the counter. The law is well settled that under such circumstances, the case is one for a jury’s determination.

Harris v. Mayes, 94

Ga. App.

505 (2) ( 95 S. E. 2d 26 );

Miller v. Bart, 90

Ga. App.

755 ( 84 S. E. 2d 127 );

Glover v. City Council of Augusta, 83

Ga. App.

314 ( 63 S. E. 2d 422 );

Mason v. Frankel, 49

Ga. App.

145 (2) ( 174 S. E. 546 );

King Hardware Co.

v. Teplis, 91

Ga. App.

13 ( 84 S. E. 2d 686 );

Atlanta Enterprises, Inc.

v. Douglass, 93

Ga. App.

237 ( 91 S. E. 2d 296 ).

The court erred in sustaining the general demurrers and in dismissing the actions.

Judgments reversed.

Quillian and Nichols, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1960: 21961: 11962: 11963: 11964: 11974: 11979: 119602026peak 1960 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.124 S.E.2d 688 (Ga. Ct. App. 1962)
  2. Burger Barn, Inc. v. Young207 S.E.2d 234 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
  3. Big Apple Super Market of Rome, Inc. v. Briggs115 S.E.2d 385 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
  4. Georgia Farmers' Market Authority v. Dabbs256 S.E.2d 613 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
  5. Rich's, Inc. v. Denmon114 S.E.2d 462 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
  6. Kroger Company v. Anderson140 S.E.2d 108 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964)

Most recent

  1. Georgia Farmers' Market Authority v. Dabbs256 S.E.2d 613 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
  2. Burger Barn, Inc. v. Young207 S.E.2d 234 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
  3. Kroger Company v. Anderson140 S.E.2d 108 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964)
  4. COLONIAL STORES, INC. v. Owens130 S.E.2d 616 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
  5. Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.124 S.E.2d 688 (Ga. Ct. App. 1962)
  6. King v. Davison-Paxon Co.123 S.E.2d 269 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
Glover v. City Council of Augusta, 63 S.E.2d 422 (Ga. Ct. App. 1951) 33
King Hardware Co. v. Teplis, 84 S.E.2d 686 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954) 22
Mason v. Frankel, 174 S.E. 546 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934) 19
Atlanta Enters. v. Douglass, 91 S.E.2d 296 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956) 6
Harris v. Mayes, 95 S.E.2d 26 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956) 1
Miller v. Bart, 81 S.E.2d 127 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list