Harrisson v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COMMISSION

Harrisson v. FLA. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 428 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided: March 23, 1983
Docket: No. 82-2144
Judges: Per Curiam
Citations: 428 So. 2d 3881983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20292

Cited by 4

Opinion — Per Curiam

428 So.2d 388 (1983)

Gary A. HARRISSON, Petitioner,

FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 82-2144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 23, 1983.

Petitioner, pro se.

*389 Enoch J. Whitney, Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole and Probation Com'n, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of his presumptive parole release date, by petition for writ of habeas corpus filed some two years after the Florida Parole and Probation Commission set the date. We treat the petition for habeas corpus as a petition for mandamus directed against the FPPC. Moore v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 289 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1974), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 2649 , 41 L.Ed.2d 239 (1974); Hardy v. Greadington, 405 So.2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Pannier v. Wainwright, 423 So.2d 533 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). We deny the writ. The response to the order to show cause demonstrates that the Commission has corrected an earlier error in computing petitioner's presumptive parole release date. Section 947.172(3), Florida Statutes (1978) does not prevent the correction of a mere clerical error. Wickham v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 989 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

PETITION DENIED.

ANSTEAD, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →

State Appellate Courts4

Relies on it most ⓘ

Shannon v. Mitchell460 So. 2d 910 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Rothermel v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N441 So. 2d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Shannon v. Turner432 So. 2d 204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Daizi v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission436 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Most recent

Shannon v. Mitchell460 So. 2d 910 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Rothermel v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N441 So. 2d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Shannon v. Turner432 So. 2d 204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Daizi v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission436 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Moore v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 417 U.S. 935 (1974)	86
	Moore v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 289 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1974)	65
	Pannier v. Wainwright, 423 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)	15
	Hardy v. Greadington, 405 So. 2d 768 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)	10
	Wickham v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Com'N, 410 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)	6
	Estate of Engskow v. Cullen, 428 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)	0

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list